News brief · About 2 min read
Cursor adds DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and shares CursorBench task-cost figures
Cursor announces DeepSeek V4.1 Flash integration and a $0.60–$0.98 per-task cost-frontier claim from its own CursorBench benchmark.
- Published here
- Source published
- Source checked
Cursor says DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is now available in its coding tool. Its short announcement pairs the integration with a comparison from the publisher’s own CursorBench benchmark.
Listen to the news
Read this article aloud or keep listening to the news.
Preparing the reader…
Device voice
Speech is handled by your browser or device. AISubHub does not send the text to an audio API. Voice availability and playback with a locked screen vary by device.
Resuming may repeat a short phrase.
What the author said · editorial paraphrase
- Cursor says users can enable DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in Cursor Settings > Models. This announces availability inside Cursor, rather than the model’s global first launch.
- The publisher claims every effort level sits on its CursorBench cost frontier across $0.60–$0.98 per task. This is Cursor’s claim within its own benchmark, not an independent comparison across all workloads.
- The image labels the score axis CursorBench 4.0 and the horizontal axis average cost per task, decreasing from left to right. It highlights DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at 47.7% and $0.98 per task: one labelled point, not the result of every effort level.
AISubHub analysis
AISubHub analysis: the integration provides another model option within an existing coding workflow. The chart describes a benchmark trade-off between score and average task cost; it does not establish that this model is best or cheapest for every coding task.
Limits and availability
These are publisher claims, not an overall first-place ranking or an independent model test. The amounts are neither token prices nor guaranteed charges on every user’s bill. Benchmark protocol, sample size, confidence intervals, hardware and reproducibility were not independently reviewed. Plans, regions, quotas and API conditions remain unverified; no model run, payment test or account-availability test was performed.
Sources and evidence
Source published: · Source checked:
AI-assisted editorial articles checked against linked primary sources. Vendor claims are attributed; inclusion is not endorsement.